From ‘’Whether Aid Works’’ to ‘’What Works’’: Finding Best Ways to Fight Poverty - TIR News - The India Review


 

From ‘’Whether Aid Works’’ to ‘’What Works’’: Finding Best Ways to Fight Poverty

October 17, 2019

In his book The End of Poverty Jeffrey Sachs argued for development aid. He was for planned development aid to poor countries to help them reach the ladder of economic development following which global market economy would take over. Basically, this meant handing over a lot of money and the money will help the poor in the nations.



Whether the development aid worked in alleviating poverty? Apparently, the answer seems to be mixed. There have been significant improvements however fighting poverty still is the topmost priority of the government. So, the shift from ‘’Whether Aid Works’’ to ‘’What Works’’ in poverty reduction. What are the best ways?

This year’s Nobel prize in Economics recognises contributions by Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer in introducing a new approach to obtaining reliable answers about the best ways to fight global poverty. Their social experiment-based approach has played significant role in poverty reduction.

The key thing is how the poverty is understood. Poverty is not merely about not having money. Poverty is about living a life not to its full potential. It has a number of facets like lack of education, lack of health, lack of the ability to realize oneself as individual etc. So, the big issue of poverty is composed of these smaller components. Coming out with effective interventions for these smaller, more manageable, components holds the key to poverty reduction for example, the most effective interventions for improving educational outcomes or child health. They have used experimental research methods in the community to test a range of interventions. The experimental technique of randomised control trials (RCT) often used in clinical sciences for identifying effective treatment interventions is used here for identifying effective poverty reduction intervention.

***

The India Review team




Comments
Syed Raza Imam Rizvi

2019-10-24 11:36:09


Some times it is better to listen to the voice of our own conscience rather than echoing the media mantras. One thing no body talks is that article 370 was signed between Hari Singh and the government of India to safeguarding, what then was assumed to be Kahmiriyat. Weather that was an aberration or something else, one thing I am sure is the growth of fundamentalism in Kashmir was ultimately responsible for the present day events and Kashmir situation. The eighties were the time which saw massive radicalization of Kashmiri Muslims through unhindered import of Salafism from Saudi Arabia. The Kashmiri Pandits who were paltry one percent of the valley populace, were systematically uprooted from the valley and forced to migrate from Kashmir v


LEAVE A REPLY